Some job applicants claim they know online Latest Mailing Database marketing like the inside of their pocket. They are more focused on 'leaving an Latest Mailing Database impression' than on being honest. You simply can't afford to go into meetings and claim you know everything. That promise will explode in your face at some point. Not knowing something is 100% more acceptable Latest Mailing Database than lying about what you're capable of.
How do you test someone Latest Mailing Database for having a critical eye? Have applicants work out a case study, and leave a mistake in it. Do they find the error Latest Mailing Database themselves? Awesome. Can't they find the error? Then you can ask if they noticed anything Latest Mailing Database crazy in the case. Some applicants may have seen it, but the stress makes them less likely to share it right away. Do they have no idea at all?
Then you explain the mistake to Latest Mailing Database them and see how they deal with it. Show a chart with misleading data and ask the applicant to interpret it. See if the applicant takes the quirk out. Or does he or she draw that obvious conclusion? Showing a chart that is straightforward should be a red flag in itself. A test can never be that simple, right? misleading Latest Mailing Database graph Can you see what's wrong with this chart? 2. Being able to think abstractly Critical thinking is important to identify potential problems. Abstract thinking is there to solve Latest Mailing Database those problems. You can gain multiple insights and draw conclusions from the large amount of data.